Crop Insurance Important for State’s Ag Industry

Tom ZachariasPop quiz: Next to tourism, what Florida industry is the state’s largest employer?

The answer isn’t health care, transportation, technology or even government. Agriculture is Florida’s second-biggest job supplier, according to the University of Florida.

“Two million jobs can be traced to the state’s agriculture, natural resources and related food industries — and not just on our 47,500 farms. Income from $142 billion in annual sales gets spent around the state to create jobs in restaurants, department stores and car dealerships, too,” Jack Payne of the University’s Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences said during a recent media interview.

Despite their importance, farmers and all they support are at the mercy of a multitude of uncontrollable forces.

A year of hard work and investment can be wiped out in an instant by a late-season hurricane, an early frost or an unexpected outbreak of insects or plant disease.

Read more…

This op-ed by Tom Zacharias, president, National Crop Insurance Services, appeared in the Fort Myers News-Press on February 6, 2015.

Convo 51

There is no question that crop insurance IS today and will be tomorrow, the linchpin of the safety net program.

Tom Zacharias Interview on AgriTalk – December, 2014

“If you look over the last couple of years, we have faced some headwinds.  Take the situation in 2012 with the extensive drought we had in the Midwest.  Last year, when we had the swing in prices and a lot of other revenue policies kicked in, so there were indemnities paid there.  The last couple of years have not met expectations for the private sector.  That said, again, these companies are in business for the long run, so we are optimistic for 2014 to see how the returns come out.  Companies have made long-term investments so they require long-term adequate return on their capital.”

To read a transcript of the entire interview, please click here.

CONVO 50

Farmers spend tens of thousands of dollars and then pray for good weather. If it all comes together, you’ve got a bountiful harvest and you’re set for the next year. If it doesn’t, then hopefully you have crop insurance.

Convo 49

Crop insurance has provided some peace of mind for many of our growers.  Some growers will collect due to drought this year and that will save them.

Convo 48

Production agriculture is constantly changing. Crop insurance is right there, making sure farmers have a modern and affordable risk management tool at their disposal.

Convo 48

Production agriculture is constantly changing. Crop insurance is right there, making sure farmers have a modern and affordable risk management tool at their disposal.

Convo 47

As a crop insurance agent, I can tell you firsthand that crop insurance is no small expense for most of the state’s farmers, who spend north of $20,000 a year purchasing policies that they pray they will not need.

Convo 46

Providing farmers the option to insure their whole farm at once gives farmers more flexibility, promotes crop diversity, and helps support the production of healthy fruits and vegetables. More flexibility also empowers farmers and ranchers to make a broader range of decisions with their land, helping them succeed and strengthening our agriculture economy.

Convo 45

Their policy, most people forget, will have a 20 percent deductible to it.  How would you like to have a homeowner’s policy with a 20 percent deductible?

Convo 44

After all, federal crop insurance is a key component of many farmers’ risk management portfolios, and it’s critical that Congress understood how a good crop insurance program can minimize exposure risks to taxpayers while providing a sound base for farmers and ranchers.

This Drought Is Awful, But with the Right Tools, Farmers Will Bounce Back

In many parts of Oklahoma, it seems like wheat farmers just can’t catch a break.

Not a one.

A late spring freeze, combined with excessively dry or extreme drought conditions throughout the winter and into spring have left many of the state’s wheat fields badly stressed or a complete bust. In fact, I’d say this is the worst I’ve ever seen, and I started farming here in the mid 1950s.

With the wheat harvest set to begin in about a month, farmers are expected to harvest about 40 percent less wheat this year than they did in 2013. The low soil moisture as we head into the hottest and driest months of the year has left many farmers wondering what they are about to go through.

For the state’s farmers who purchased crop insurance – and nowadays that’s nearly all of them – that will be their only saving grace. I don’t know of a farmer anywhere in Oklahoma who doesn’t buy crop insurance. It’s just like buying diesel fuel today…you don’t farm without it.

With the passage of the new Farm Bill, largely gone are the days of the Federal government stepping in and helping farmers who have been hit by a calamity.

Such bills cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars in the past, and were not only expensive but also slow to deliver the help to the farmers who needed it. Today, when a farm crisis hits, farmers turn to their crop insurance policy, not the Federal government, for help. The public-private partnership that is today’s crop insurance ensures that farmers get the financial help they need in weeks, not years.

As a crop insurance agent, I can tell you firsthand that crop insurance is no small expense for most of the state’s farmers, who spend north of $20,000 a year purchasing policies that they pray they will not need. Of course there are smaller farmers and larger farmers, whose premiums exceed $70,000, but the point is that it isn’t cheap.

Farmers buy crop insurance today just like they buy homeowners and car insurance. And when what looks like a promising year turns into a bust, the only thing standing between some farmers and bankruptcy is their crop insurance policies.

Last year, Oklahoma farmers spent more than $91 million out of their own pockets to purchase the peace of mind and protection of crop insurance.

Crop insurance allows individual farmers to purchase the coverage they need, tailored to their farms, their financial standing and their tolerance to risk.

For farmers who rely on loans to operate – and that’s a lot of farmers – crop insurance has become a bank’s best friend. In fact, the best collateral you can take to a bank when you are seeking a loan is your crop insurance policy. The bank will often co-sign the policy with the farmer, and in doing so, they are assured that part of their loan is covered, regardless of weather or price swings.

Crop insurance is not only smart farm policy, but smart consumer policy as well. American consumers have come to see our affordable, abundant food supply as a birthright. In fact, most of us alive today have never seen wide-scale hunger in this country. But much of what we take for granted could quickly disappear if we allow our farmers to fail and were forced to import our food, fiber and fuel. That is not a position many of us would choose to be in and it underscores the fact that having a strong farm sector is a national security issue.

While this might be the worst drought I’ve ever seen, I have to say that my faith in the resilience and work ethic of Oklahoma’s farmers is undying, and I know that with their crop insurance policies as a backstop, our farmers will bounce back from this. When Congress addresses crop insurance in the next Farm Bill five years down the road, I hope it is to protect the public-private partnership that has made it successful and to further improve and expand its protection.

Max Claybaker is a farmer and a crop insurance insurance agent from Blackwell, Oklahoma.  This op-ed appeared in The Oklahoman on June 1, 2014.

 

This Drought Is Awful, But with the Right Tools, Farmers Will Bounce Back

In many parts of Oklahoma, it seems like wheat farmers just can’t catch a break.

Not a one.

A late spring freeze, combined with excessively dry or extreme drought conditions throughout the winter and into spring have left many of the state’s wheat fields badly stressed or a complete bust. In fact, I’d say this is the worst I’ve ever seen, and I started farming here in the mid 1950s.

With the wheat harvest set to begin in about a month, farmers are expected to harvest about 40 percent less wheat this year than they did in 2013. The low soil moisture as we head into the hottest and driest months of the year has left many farmers wondering what they are about to go through.

For the state’s farmers who purchased crop insurance – and nowadays that’s nearly all of them – that will be their only saving grace. I don’t know of a farmer anywhere in Oklahoma who doesn’t buy crop insurance. It’s just like buying diesel fuel today…you don’t farm without it.

With the passage of the new Farm Bill, largely gone are the days of the Federal government stepping in and helping farmers who have been hit by a calamity.

Such bills cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars in the past, and were not only expensive but also slow to deliver the help to the farmers who needed it. Today, when a farm crisis hits, farmers turn to their crop insurance policy, not the Federal government, for help. The public-private partnership that is today’s crop insurance ensures that farmers get the financial help they need in weeks, not years.

As a crop insurance agent, I can tell you firsthand that crop insurance is no small expense for most of the state’s farmers, who spend north of $20,000 a year purchasing policies that they pray they will not need. Of course there are smaller farmers and larger farmers, whose premiums exceed $70,000, but the point is that it isn’t cheap.

Farmers buy crop insurance today just like they buy homeowners and car insurance. And when what looks like a promising year turns into a bust, the only thing standing between some farmers and bankruptcy is their crop insurance policies.

Last year, Oklahoma farmers spent more than $91 million out of their own pockets to purchase the peace of mind and protection of crop insurance.

Crop insurance allows individual farmers to purchase the coverage they need, tailored to their farms, their financial standing and their tolerance to risk.

For farmers who rely on loans to operate – and that’s a lot of farmers – crop insurance has become a bank’s best friend. In fact, the best collateral you can take to a bank when you are seeking a loan is your crop insurance policy. The bank will often co-sign the policy with the farmer, and in doing so, they are assured that part of their loan is covered, regardless of weather or price swings.

Crop insurance is not only smart farm policy, but smart consumer policy as well. American consumers have come to see our affordable, abundant food supply as a birthright. In fact, most of us alive today have never seen wide-scale hunger in this country. But much of what we take for granted could quickly disappear if we allow our farmers to fail and were forced to import our food, fiber and fuel. That is not a position many of us would choose to be in and it underscores the fact that having a strong farm sector is a national security issue.

While this might be the worst drought I’ve ever seen, I have to say that my faith in the resilience and work ethic of Oklahoma’s farmers is undying, and I know that with their crop insurance policies as a backstop, our farmers will bounce back from this. When Congress addresses crop insurance in the next Farm Bill five years down the road, I hope it is to protect the public-private partnership that has made it successful and to further improve and expand its protection.

Max Claybaker is a farmer and a crop insurance insurance agent from Blackwell, Oklahoma.  This op-ed appeared in The Oklahoman on June 1, 2014.

 

Convo 43

Losing a crop is very disappointing, especially when you are at the very end, you are close to harvest, you put all of this time and money into it, and then you lose it. That is when it is nice to have crop insurance.

Convo 42

Today, crop insurance is the foundation of this Farm Bill and the farm safety net. The farmer gets a bill, not a check with crop insurance…and they don’t get help unless they really need it.

Convo 41

Had we not had that safety net, it might be difficult for you to walk to the supermarket and pick up that loaf of bread.

Convo 40

“In addition to covering a host of other crop insurance-related issues, the newly released online resource also addresses major and minor policy changes in the 2014 Farm Bill, including the introduction of new products including SCO and STAX, new products available for beginning farmers, the link between the premium discount and conservation and newly authorized pilot programs.” Dr. Keith Collins, economic consultant to National Crop Insurance Services

Convo 40

“In addition to covering a host of other crop insurance-related issues, the newly released online resource also addresses major and minor policy changes in the 2014 Farm Bill, including the introduction of new products including SCO and STAX, new products available for beginning farmers, the link between the premium discount and conservation and newly authorized pilot programs.” Dr. Keith Collins, economic consultant to National Crop Insurance Services

Convo 39

“The industry fully understands the responsibility we carry as farmers’ primary risk management tool. We feel blessed to be in this position and are fully committed to improve the integrity of the system, develop new policies for crops that aren’t currently covered, and deliver first-rate customer service to our farmer customers.” Tom Zacharias, President, National Crop Insurance Services

Convo 38

The bill also strengthens crop insurance, which is an essential cost-effective risk management tool. With crop insurance, farmers invest in their own risk management by purchasing insurance policies so they are protected in difficult times. Crop insurance also helps protect Americans from spikes in food prices. Without crop insurance farmers would have no way to recover from disaster unless the government steps in and provides unplanned disaster assistance.

Joint Statement on Farm Bill Conference Committee Report

Contact: Laurie Langstraat, NCIS – 913-685-2767

(January 28, 2014) – American Association of Crop Insurers, Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Bureau and National Crop Insurance Services, in response to the Farm Bill conference committee filing its conference report last night, released the following statement:

“We are pleased that Senate and House conferees have reached a bipartisan compromise and produced a legislative package that gives modern-day agriculture the tools it needs for success in today’s world. There is a strong consensus among lawmakers that crop insurance should be enhanced and serve as the centerpiece of the farm safety net moving forward, which underscores the success the policy has seen over the years and the popularity it enjoys among farmers.

“Since crop insurance’s rise to prominence, overall farm policy spending has gone down because farmers and private insurers help shoulder risk that was otherwise borne by taxpayers. In addition, rural economies have benefited because crop insurance makes sure farmers quickly and accurately receive the help then they need it the most.

“We also applaud conferees for rejecting multiple attempts to minimize crop insurance’s effectiveness by making it more difficult for all farmers to obtain a key risk management tool. The Farm Bill is now one step closer to completion and we urge the House and Senate to approve the farm bill expeditiously. Farmers need the peace of mind provided by a 5-year farm bill and a vibrant crop insurance infrastructure to ensure that this nation’s agriculture sector remains vibrant and productive.”

###

Convo 37

Given our new ‘normal’ characterized by volatility everywhere-in weather, markets and regulation-farmers would struggle without access to crop insurance, a vital tool for rural America and the new face of farm policy.

Convo 36

Farmers are not paid to buy crop insurance. Farmers pay for crop insurance. They spent about $4 billion of their own money in 2012 for premium, and last year when we had the catastrophic drought through the Midwest, before those deductibles kicked in, farmers absorbed just under $13 billion in uninsured losses.

Crop Insurance Helps NC Farmers Weather the Ups and Downs

From rags to riches. From feast to famine. From pauper to prince. We’ve all heard the phrases to describe going from one extreme condition to the opposite. But farmers in North Carolina understand this concept first hand. Unfortunately.

In 2011, just about every imaginable weather disaster hit the state. It started with frigid cold, moved on to a sweltering heat wave, interspersed with a historic tornado outbreak and then hurricane flooding.

In 2012, started out with much of the state experiencing a severe drought, but thankfully Mother Nature eventually dealt a kinder hand to farmers in the Tar Heel state than most of the rest of the county, who experienced the worst drought since the Dust Bowl.

This unending rollercoaster of weather extremes underscores the reason why year after year, farmers across the country happily purchase crop insurance to help mitigate the unknowns that are never far from hand. In the past, disasters like these would have triggered large disaster relief bills, much like what was passed after…

Convo 35

Crop insurance is a partnership between the farmer, the government and the insurance company. The farmer pays some and the government pays some and this benefits the entire economy and the entire country.

Convo 34

Without crop insurance, these farmers would have no way to recover from these devastating conditions unless the government would step in to provide immediate, unplanned, and unbudgeted disaster assistance. With crop insurance, farmers are able to plan for disasters by paying for coverage. This coverage doesn’t make them whole, but rather helps them survive.

Crop insurance helped make this years bounty possible

By Tim Totheroh

photoI’ve been a farmer all my life. I’m also a crop insurance adjuster, which means last summer was a busy time for me.

By the end of harvest claims last year, I visited more than 200 farms, meeting with the farmers, inspecting their losses and adjusting their crop insurance claims. It was sad at times because farmers take crop losses personally.

I’ve never seen anything like what I witnessed last summer in Illinois. In one field, I walked a half-mile through the field and walked the half-mile back in another part of the field, and I never saw a single ear of corn. Not one ear.

Some varieties of corn did better than others, and Mother Nature was kinder to some farmers than to others. When all was said and done, we ended up with about half of a normal corn crop at harvest. Even with half of a harvest, farmers still had a full tab of bills to pay.

I’ll never forget the faces of young farmers shaken by the sight of their year’s income slowly withering in the…

NCIS Responds to OIG Prevented Planting Report

Contact Laurie Langstraat, 913-685-2767

The following statement regarding the USDA/OIG report “RMA: Controls Over Prevented Planting” should be attributed to Tom Zacharias, president, National Crop Insurance Services.

“Prevented planting is a potentially devastating situation which is why many farmers purchase crop insurance to help mitigate the risk. It is important that preventing planting coverage provisions be clarified to control loss situations and improve the integrity of the crop insurance program. ”

“In addition, it should be noted that crop insurance companies have millions of dollars at stake on these policies, so it is also in our best interest that any ambiguities be addressed. To that end, the industry has made a number of recommendations to RMA to further clarify the provisions of the crop insurance policy and promote program integrity. Several of these recommendations are to be implemented for the 2014 and succeeding crop years. Crop insurance is the primary risk management tool for America’s farmers and any changes that strengthen the program benefits farmers, taxpayers and participating companies alike.”

 ###

NCIS Responds to Bloomberg News Series on Crop Insurance

Contact Laurie Langstraat, 913-685-2767

The following statement should be attributed to Tom Zacharias, president, National Crop Insurance Services, in response to the Bloomberg News series on crop insurance:

“Over the last decade, elected officials, financial institutions, farm leaders and farmers have reached a general consensus that crop insurance is the best risk management tool available. That conclusion was reached because crop insurance reduces the risk exposure to taxpayers while requiring farmers to purchase policies with their own money before enjoying the relative protection of insurance. In short, it forces farmers to manage risk before, not after it happens, which saves taxpayers money.

“The factual errors, blatant omissions and obvious bias in this series were stunning and it is unfortunate that the editors of Bloomberg News agreed to release these stories publicly. It was a great disservice to their readers and a personal insult to the hardworking farmers and ranchers of this nation.”

 ###

NCIS Responds to Bloomberg News Series on Crop Insurance

Contact Laurie Langstraat, 913-685-2767

The following statement should be attributed to Tom Zacharias, president, National Crop Insurance Services, in response to the Bloomberg News series on crop insurance:

“Over the last decade, elected officials, financial institutions, farm leaders and farmers have reached a general consensus that crop insurance is the best risk management tool available. That conclusion was reached because crop insurance reduces the risk exposure to taxpayers while requiring farmers to purchase policies with their own money before enjoying the relative protection of insurance. In short, it forces farmers to manage risk before, not after it happens, which saves taxpayers money.

“The factual errors, blatant omissions and obvious bias in this series were stunning and it is unfortunate that the editors of Bloomberg News agreed to release these stories publicly. It was a great disservice to their readers and a personal insult to the hardworking farmers and ranchers of this nation.”

 ###

Convo 33

Crop insurance “has come under unfair criticism. Those who report on it don’t understand it and its importance to the food supply.” He said it’s expensive to put a crop in the ground, and that a farmer could easily have half a million dollars at risk when “Mother Nature says you’re not going to have rain for the next 90 days.”

A farmer who gets a crop insurance policy doesn’t get paid for 100 percent of his loss, he noted.

The general public doesn’t approve of direct payments that crop farmers get whether prices are high or low, he said, but “I think we can make a strong case for crop insurance … and some program to supplement it.

 

NCIS Responds to Bloomberg News Story

Contact: Laurie Langstraat, 913-685-2767

The following statement should be attributed to Tom Zacharias, president, National Crop Insurance Services and is in response to the Bloomberg News story “Taxpayers turn U.S. farmers into fat cats with subsidies”:

“The primary reason behind the growth and success of crop insurance over the last decade is that farmers, farm groups, banks and other lenders, elected officials and those who live and work in rural America understand that it is the best, most cost-effective risk management tool farmers have.   That is why the lack of balance and clear agenda behind the first in this series of articles is so troubling.

“For example, the article claims that the government “pays farmers to buy coverage,” which is absolutely false.  Farmers purchase crop insurance policies with money out of their own pockets.  If a loss does not occur, which is the case for most farmers in most years, then purchasing crop insurance is a net loss, not a gain, for farmers.

“In truth, crop insurance is a win-win scenario for all stakeholders in agriculture and the public in general.  For farmers and the rural economies they support, it is a critical risk management tool that helps farmers who purchase policies recover from natural disasters.   For financial institutions, a crop insurance policy serves as collateral for a farmer’s production loan that might otherwise not be feasible.  For taxpayers, crop insurance has all but eliminated large-scale emergency disaster bills, which fell fully on their laps every time and cost more than $70 billion since 1989.

“It should be noted that overall farm safety net spending has fallen dramatically since the rise of crop insurance. Unfortunately, this series is providing a platform to the critics of crop insurance, who for various reasons want to implode any farm safety net and return America to the past days of costly, cumbersome agriculture disaster bills and financial disruption for America’s farmers.

“Crop insurance is a modern-day farm policy for today’s unique weather and market challenges and it, and the farmers who raise our feed, food and fuel, deserve praise, not condemnation.”

 ###

The new face of farm policy: crop insurance

By Andrew Bowman

Aug. 2, 2013-From walking on soil baked into near-concrete during the worst drought in over 50 years in 2012, to dredging across flooded fields this soggy spring, farmers continue to face uncertainty. And that’s just weather. As a 27-year-old farmer, I’m starting to wonder what “normal” even means.

Andrew Bowman photoIn my short career, corn prices have been under $2 and over $8 per bushel, land prices have nearly tripled since I purchased my first field, more regulations point to greater expense without offsetting revenue, and farm policy has evolved from focusing on price supports and direct payments toward a more market-oriented risk management tool called crop insurance, a public-private partnership whereby farmers purchase policies and only receive a payment if there is a documented loss. Given our new “normal” characterized by volatility everywhere-in weather, markets and regulation-farmers would struggle without access to crop insurance, a vital tool for rural America and the new face of farm policy.

The farm bill, which will guide American agriculture for the next five years, is currently being debated in Congress. Current farm bill proposals eliminate direct payments, which are cash subsidies based on historical price figures. Price support mechanisms still exist, but are much reduced-corn and soybean price supports as proposed in the House are 72 percent and 75 percent of the 2008-2012 Olympic Average Price, respectively, and the Senate version is even lower at 55 percent for both crops. These programs are less necessary because crop insurance has assumed the role as the primary risk management tool for farmers.

Crop insurance saves taxpayers’ money. When disasters struck in the past, recovery was paid for completely by taxpayers. And that doesn’t include the other trade-distorting supply controls and price support policies enacted in response to farm crises. Last year, in contrast, when farmers here in Illinois were decimated by drought, we had crop insurance and didn’t need a disaster bill to help us plant this year.

It is a vast improvement over the price support system and direct payments of the past. Farmers must put “skin in the game.” Many even complain about the money lost over the years purchasing crop insurance. Moreover, we lose a hefty deductible-15 percent minimum-before any claims are paid out. Last year, this deductible was $12.7 billion. Coupled with $4.1 billion in premiums paid last year, farmers lost or paid nearly $17 billion before crop insurance kicked in. It’s a major expense for us, but one we’re happy to pay for because it gives us something this new “normal” rarely allows: peace of mind. From the federal government’s perspective, it may be a liability, but the public-private partnership means taxpayers and farmers also shoulder the rewards in the form of underwriting gains during good years. In fact, from 2001-2010, the government saw $3.99 billion in gains.

And the benefits extend to rural communities. The average American farmer is 58, the oldest at any time in our history. Assuming most retire at 65, we are seven years from real problems if we don’t start transitioning to the next generation. Crop insurance helps young farmers because it serves as “stop-loss” collateral to back credit-a crucial transition tool given the high capital costs of farming. In this sense, it is a bridge to the future for America’s farmers.

Crop insurance also supports farmers’ working capital, allowing cash to flow back into the economy. Farmers in other countries need to stockpile a large share of their profits into cash reserves planning for a bad year so they have sufficient liquidity when disaster strikes. Because American farmers have crop insurance, they don’t need enormous cash reserves and can instead reinvest profits. I have paid down debt and invested in newer, more sustainable technologies faster because crop insurance covered the risk…

Convo 32

The crop insurance program is very important to us and I don’t think there’s any better example of that than last year’s drought.  On our farm in northwest Missouri we raised about half of what we anticipate raising.

Crop Insurance Helps State Farmers Through Bad Years

By TOM MARCH | OP-ED

For fresh fruits and vegetables, there has been a recent convergence of trends and preferences that bode well for the industry.

The first is the federal government’s decision to ensure that more fresh fruits and vegetables are consumed in school meal programs, which will expose children who otherwise have limited access to these important foods. The other trend is the locavore — or eating local — movement, which underscores the importance of buying local and eating fresh produce.

But to ensure that fresh fruits and vegetables are available for a population that is increasingly asking for them, we need to have wise public policies in place to help the farmers here in Connecticut and elsewhere who grow these important foods to manage the risks brought on by Mother Nature…

 

Convo 31

We’ve paid about $17 billion in indemnities. I think that shows this program worked and it worked as it was intended. We got the money out to the producers and it’s going to help an awful lot of people stay in business that, had we not had a really good crop insurance, may not have been farming this year.

Convo 30

After two years without rain, Kansas producers are dealing with a severe drought. It is critical that risk management tools like crop insurance are in place to make certain the United States remains the most food-secure country in the world. Crop insurance is an example of a public-private partnership that uses taxpayers’ dollars wisely and benefits farmers and consumers alike.

Convo 29

Crop insurance is the single most important risk management tool available to farmers today.

Convo 29

We have skin in the game. We aren’t just accepting a handout or subsidy from the government.

Convo 28

I can’t even imagine farming without crop insurance.

Convo 27

Crop insurance has prevented lots of farm stress that would have occurred without it.

Crop Insurance Is Critical to Michigan’s Specialty Crop Industry

By Steve Umlor

The affordability and bounty of the American food system did not occur by happenstance. It took wise policies supported by dedicated officials, hardworking farmers willing to risk their fortunes and a first-rate transportation and distribution system.

Many of the policies that underpin food production chiefly support the major food and feed commodities like corn, wheat and soybeans. But for those of us raising specialty crops – those fruits, vegetables and nuts that are an important part of our diet – there’s only one major risk management tool available: crop insurance.

Crop insurance is a public-private partnership whereby farmers purchase their own policies to cover the risks they choose to pay for. Michigan’s farmers face a huge amount of risk on a daily basis, including early frosts, drought, floods and market…

Crop Insurance Is Critical to Michigan’s Specialty Crop Industry

By Steve Umlor

The affordability and bounty of the American food system did not occur by happenstance. It took wise policies supported by dedicated officials, hardworking farmers willing to risk their fortunes and a first-rate transportation and distribution system.

Many of the policies that underpin food production chiefly support the major food and feed commodities like corn, wheat and soybeans. But for those of us raising specialty crops – those fruits, vegetables and nuts that are an important part of our diet – there’s only one major risk management tool available: crop insurance.

Crop insurance is a public-private partnership whereby farmers purchase their own policies to cover the risks they choose to pay for. Michigan’s farmers face a huge amount of risk on a daily basis, including early frosts, drought, floods and market…

Convo 26

But farmers aren’t the only group that has come to love crop insurance. Bankers love it too. That’s because when farmers approach bankers for production loans, bankers regard a crop insurance policy as a form of collateral. Additionally, bankers know that a farmer who has paid his own money for a crop insurance policy is a farmer who has risk management in mind.

Setting the Record Straight on Crop Insurance

By Tom Zacharias, National Crop Insurance Services

Admittedly, opponents of farm policy attract more headlines than the men and women who put food on our tables and clothes on our backs.

Then again, it is far easier to get attention with sensationalist claims and unsubstantiated data.

Take the drought of 2012 for example. Opponents of crop insurance made news by claiming that taxpayers would be responsible for as much as $40 billion. Critics called crop insurance a farmer bailout and said things like farmers were “laughing all the way to the bank” and were “praying for drought, not praying for rain.”

Never were these anti-agriculture activists and for-hire university economists criticized for their bombastic tone or baseless predictions that turned out to be incredibly inaccurate.

Sure, farmers tried to set the record straight, but supporting a farm policy that helped protect taxpayer dollars is not as glamorous as inflated estimates and inflammatory rhetoric.

Now, crop insurance opponents are at it again as Congress prepares to negotiate a farm bill. Farmers have been accused of “taking bribes.” Farmers even have been compared to cheap drunks at an open bar and told to pay their fair share.

Use of such language and misleading information…

Crop Insurance Fits Nation’s Fiscal Reality

By Patrick Solon, Streator, Illinois

The historic 2012 drought that wilted the corn and soybean fields of Illinois and other Midwest states was one of the costliest events to hit rural America in decades.

As the nightly news reported, losses on farms in large swaths of the Midwest were staggering, with some farmers having such low yields that harvesting was a waste of time.

I feel I live in an oasis. The drought and heat wave that crippled farmers in neighboring counties and nearby states somehow spared my farm and a few others here in north central Illinois. I don’t know if it’s where the farm is located, the soil it sits on or just the luck of the draw in getting a few rain showers here and there, but somehow, I was spared.

This makes me feel lucky, on one hand, since I did not face the dread of losing my crops, but guilty on the other hand because so many other farmers did.

In past years, a disaster on this level would have triggered a massive, ad hoc disaster…

Do No Harm to Farm Insurance

By Andrew Bowman, Oneida, Illinois

Hearings have started in Washington on the next farm bill. I count myself as one of the many farmers who will stand together and urge Congress to “do no harm” to crop insurance, which has become the front line risk management tool for American farmers.

Crop insurance is a public-private partnership whereby farmers like myself put “skin in the game” by purchasing policies to manage the many risks we face in this line of work. It does not guarantee profits, nor does it ensure farmers cannot fail. It protects farmers against circumstances beyond their control but does not prevent poorly managed farms from going under. Essentially, it allows market forces to work. Farmers gladly purchase crop insurance, and last year spent $4.1 billion out of their own pockets to do so.

How well is crop insurance working? Last year, most of the Midwest sizzled under a heat wave and drought that cut harvests in half for some farmers and virtually destroyed entire…

Senate Agriculture Committee Approves Farm Bill with Broad Bipartisan Support

The U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry today voted to approve the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012, a bipartisan Farm Bill authored by Committee Chairwoman Senator Debbie Stabenow and Ranking Member Senator Pat Roberts.

The bill reforms food and agricultural policy by eliminating direct payments and emphasizing the need to strengthen risk management tools for farmers, saving billions of dollars. Overall, the Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012 will reduce the deficit by $23 billion dollars by eliminating unnecessary subsidies, consolidating programs to end duplication, and cracking down on food assistance abuse. These reforms allow for the strengthening of key initiatives that help farmers and small businesses reach new markets and create American jobs. The measure will now go to the full Senate for consideration.

“The Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012 will save taxpayers billions of dollars while promising a safe and healthy national food supply. By eliminating duplication, and streamlining and consolidating programs, we were able to continue investing in initiatives that help farmers and small businesses create jobs. This bill proves that by working across party lines, we can save taxpayer money and create smart, cost-effective policies that lay the foundation for a stronger, more prosperous economy. I am proud that once again the Agriculture Committee was able to work together in a bipartisan way to complete major reforms that save money and grow our economy.”

Stabenow continued, “We now look forward to continuing to work with our colleagues in a bipartisan way to ensure we enact a Farm Bill this year before the current one expires. Agriculture supports 16 million jobs in our country, and it is absolutely critical to provide farmers the certainty they need to plan and grow by passing a Farm Bill this year.”

NCIS Responds to Environmental Working Group’s Accusations – May 1, 2013

A recent report prepared by Bruce Babcock and funded by the Environmental Working Group calls crop insurance “a bloated, taxpayer-funded income support program” and that farmers are profiting from the 2012 drought because of crop insurance. Is this true?

Absolutely not. It should come as no great surprise that the recent EWG report prepared by Bruce Babcock is highly critical of the crop insurance program. Once again, the public is being led to believe by the EWG that farmers are somehow profiting from the drought of 2012 and crop insurance indemnities. This is simply not true. In 2012, indemnities paid to farmers for losses will total approximately $17 billion.

The report states that crop insurance has ‘turned more into a farm income support program than a crop insurance program…’ Unfortunately, EWG fails to acknowledge that before farmers received a single dime in crop insurance indemnity payments, they shouldered $12.7 billion in losses as part of their crop insurance policy deductibles, and an additional $4.1 billion was paid out by farmers to purchase their policies. Thus, farmers absorbed approximately $17 billion in uninsured losses and premium expenditures out of their own pockets before insurance.”

Compared to ad hoc disaster relief, the private sector delivery system allows for indemnity payments to be made on a timely basis. With crop insurance, farmers are able to plant their crops for 2013 and stay in business. Contrast this to the experience of victims of Hurricane Sandy who struggled to get relief and then have waited for its distribution.

This report also ignores the fact that crop insurance companies will suffer losses due to the 2012 drought, and that the federal government made nearly $4 billion in underwriting gains from 2001-2010. The report focuses primarily on the unusual, 1-in-25-year drought of 2012 and not the long term performance and improvements that have been made to the crop insurance.

The report ignores the fact that farmers may pay premiums for many years and suffer no losses, or losses within their deductibles, in order to have sufficient protection for the years like 2012. The report ignores the substantial funding reductions in the safety net for farmers that will be part of the new farm bill.

The report is also highly critical of a type of insurance that farmers can purchase known as the Harvest Price Option. Without the harvest price option, the producer’s loss would be indemnified at the lower price projected at the start of the season. Unfortunately, such an indemnity would place many farmers in financial jeopardy. Many farmers enter a forward contract to sell a portion of their production before harvest. Usually these contracts pay the producer for the production they deliver after harvest based on harvest prices.

If the producer loses the crop, the producer is still obligated to deliver under the forward contract. But since the producer has lost the crop, the producer would have to buy the commodity at the harvest price and deliver that or financially settle the buyer’s contract at the harvest price. The purpose of the harvest price option is to provide the producer with sufficient funds to settle the forward contract.

Farmers utilize crop insurance because it enables them to manage their own risk, be it weather or market related. Congress supports crop insurance because it shifts the risk of natural disaster from taxpayers and takes the politics out of natural disasters.

Good Farming Practices Aren’t Always Enough

By Bill Bridgeforth

It is hard to talk about the state of Alabama without mentioning agriculture. Alabama boasts more than 48,000 farms, covering roughly 28 percent of the state.

But being a farmer in the Deep South – given our weather patterns – is like owning an unpredictable dog. One day it loves you, the next day, it bites you.

In farming, when that dog decides to bite you, it comes in the form of powerful thunderstorms, hurricanes or droughts. That’s why for every year of the last thirty-five years that I’ve farmed, I purchase crop insurance. In fact, I can’t even conceive of farming without crop insurance.

In the past, when large-scale natural disasters hit farmers, Congress was immediately pressured to pass expensive, ad hoc disaster bills that were completely paid for by the public. Such disaster bills, while appreciated by farmers, took up to a year or more to arrive. But farmers need money in hand quickly after disaster strikes, because they must start planning, and purchasing inputs, for the next season.

That’s the beauty of crop insurance. First of all, taxpayers aren’t stuck footing the whole bill if and when disaster strikes. Crop insurance is purchased by each individual farmer, tailored specifically to the crops grown, the land the farm sits on and the farmer’s tolerance for risk.

Crop insurance isn’t cheap by any stretch of the imagination. The policies I purchase cost several hundred thousand dollars a year. But I consider that just a cost of production, because if disaster strikes, I can expect my crop insurance indemnity in about a month or less, not the years it takes for federal help to arrive. Those months saved can mean the difference between success and failure in farming.

Farmers across the country spent $4.1 billion purchasing crop insurance policies in 2012. The policies purchased insured 271 million acres, or roughly 86 percent of all planted cropland in the U.S.

But farmers aren’t the only group that has come to love crop insurance. Bankers love it too. That’s because when farmers approach bankers for production loans, bankers regard a crop insurance policy as a form of collateral. Additionally, bankers know that a farmer who has paid his own money for a crop insurance policy is a farmer who has risk management in mind.

Of course like any other public policy, crop insurance has its enemies. Some of those groups used last year’s historic drought to not only criticize the availability of crop insurance, but to also attack the character of farmers like me, who purchase it. One group said that farmers were “praying for drought, not rain,” implying that farmers would get rich from their crop insurance policies.

I was one of those farmers who suffered from the drought last year and let me set the record straight: We do everything we can to have the highest production possible every year. We select a good variety of seed, purchase the best fertilizer and do everything we can to protect the crop. If there ever were any farmers trying to live off of crop insurance, they’re long gone. The cost of production is just too high.

But if America is going to continue to enjoy its plentiful and affordable food supply, the country must also focus on helping the next generation of farmers to gain their footing and learn the trade. To that end, I am a founding member and Chairman of the National Black Growers Council, which serves as a network for black men and women who are involved in agriculture. Our mission is to improve the viability and profitability of the black row crop farmers, and to develop black talent for the next generation of farmers.

To that next generation of farmers who is seeking my advice, one of the first things I’d tell them is to make sure crop insurance is a line item in your annual budget. Because all of the best farming practices in the world aren’t going to stop Mother Nature from raining on your parade, at least every now and then.

Bill Bridgeforth farms corn, cotton, soybeans and canola and lives in Tanner, Alabama.